Quick takeaway: Many Gen Z women grew up watching their mothers carry the mental, emotional, and domestic load while men were praised for “helping,” and they’re choosing not to repeat that life. With visibility, language, and economic independence, they recognise inequality as structural — not personal failure — and no longer measure their worth by marriage or motherhood. This isn’t a rejection of love; it’s a refusal to accept love that requires exhaustion, sacrifice, or self-erasure.
Many Gen Z women grew up observing how gendered expectations shaped their mothers’ lives. They watched women carry the mental load of households, managing schedules, soothing egos, prioritising everyone else’s wellbeing, while quietly shrinking or abandoning their own ambitions. Others watched their working mothers shoulder full responsibility for the domestic load as well. Women were praised for “holding it all together,” while men were congratulated for merely “helping.” This was not ideology or theory; it was daily, lived experience.
Traditional religious and social structures reinforced these dynamics. Divorce was often condemned even in the presence of domestic violence, trapping women in circumstances they should have been protected from. The message was clear: endurance was virtuous, sacrifice was expected, and leaving was failure. Against this backdrop, it is not surprising that young women question why they would willingly choose a life that exhausted and constrained their mothers.
What has changed is visibility. Social media has given language to experiences that older generations endured in silence. Concepts like weaponised incompetence, coercive control, emotional avoidance, male fragility, and domestic inequality now circulate openly. Young women see thousands of stories on social media that mirror what they noticed growing up. Once these patterns are named and recognised as structural rather than personal failures, they become impossible to ignore.
Economic independence has been a decisive shift. For generations, patriarchy relied heavily on financial dependence to keep control. As women gained access to education, employment, and independent income, the underlying script changed. Young women support themselves, and no longer automatically buy into to a husband-and-children model. The historical exchange of male income for female unpaid labour has largely collapsed, and with it the fear-based labels once used to coerce women into compliance. Terms like “spinster” or “left on the shelf” hold now power over Gen X women.
Young women do not measure their worth by relationship status or motherhood. The expectation that a woman’s value is fulfilled through partnership or children is increasingly recognised as outdated and optional rather than inevitable. Many are choosing to stay single or childfree, not out of rejection or failure, but through deliberate, informed decision-making.
Gen X women have genuine alternatives to the tradition relationship model. They are choosing to stay single, date casually, live alone, prioritise career and personal peace and build “chosen families” with friends. Many are focusing on their own development rather than performing the role of carer within a traditional family structure. Young women understand that a woman’s social and personal value does not expire if she remains unmarried or childfree.
This shift is not a rejection of men, love, or relationships. It is a rejection of inequality, chronic compromise and emotional burnout. Gen X women are choosing autonomy over appeasement, and standards over silence.
For generations, women were conditioned to believe that partnership with a man was not merely normal but necessary. Gen X women do not buy into the belief that marriage and motherhood define a woman’s worth.
That is not to say they don’t want relationships, connection still matters deeply, but they are choosing to engage on their own terms rather than conforming to traditional expectations.
It’s important to recognise that this shift did not happen in a vacuum. For many mothers and grandmothers, challenging these norms was not a matter of preference or ideology, but one of survival. Defying expectations could mean social exile, financial insecurity, loss of custody, violence, or lifelong stigma. Their choices were shaped by the limits placed on them and the freedoms Gen X women now enjoy, exist because earlier generations who challenged the constraints, often did so at great personal cost.
What we are witnessing now is not the death of love. It is the refusal to accept love at the cost of self.
Infemism 
Leave a comment